![]() Every year there is at least one Doug Martin-type who goes high in drafts and doesn't return value. He has played at least 15 games in six of seven seasons, so he is the least likely running back of the top options to fall off the cliff. Adding Ben Grubbs to the offensive line should help, and the additions of Jeremy Maclin and a fully healthy Travis Kelce to start the season will improve an offense that averaged five points per game fewer in 2014 than it did in 2013.īut the argument for Charles is found not in last year's stats but rather throughout his career. ![]() Touchdowns from year to year are fluky (and again, he scored nine rushing touchdowns), and he touched the ball almost 250 times. He averaged basically the same number of rushing yards after contact and receiving yards after contact and, per our friends at Pro Football Focus, actually had more fantasy points on a per-carry basis than he did in 2013.Ĭharles' touches were down last season, as were his touchdowns, so the people who want to knock him use those stats. Yes, he went from 19 touchdowns in 2013 to 14 last season, but look closer: He had the same yards per carry, and he was still top-five in the NFL among running backs in yards per rush, rushing touchdowns, receiving touchdowns and routes run. People will point to last season as being a down year for Charles, but I disagree. In fact, he is second in fantasy points during the past three years across all positions. Since Andy Reid took over the Kansas City Chiefs, no running back has scored more fantasy points in ESPN standard scoring than Charles. No, Jamaal Charles is as safe as they come. No suspensions looming, no insane usage during the past four years where you worry about a decline, no injury concerns, no age or off-the-field issues, no concerns about lack of carries or him being touchdown-dependent. (Truthfully, he's neck-and-neck with Peterson for me now that Peterson has reported to the Vikings, but this article is about Charles.) Charles is the safest guy. That safety is why Jamaal Charles is my pick for No. 1 pick." Both statements are practical, preaching being conservative over swinging for the fences early on. The other line I use a lot - I'm both a slave to tradition and fairly lazy - is this: "You don't have to finish the year as the No. ![]() Just ask anyone with Adrian Peterson on their team last year. If you blow your first-round pick, you're probably done for the season. The first round (especially the first pick) is not a place to get cute or mess around. "You can't win your league in the first round, but you can lose it." I've used that line a lot over the years, and it's proved to be true time and again. You have reached a degraded version of because you're using an unsupported version of Internet Explorer.įor a complete experience, please upgrade or use a supported browser ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |